Riparian Areas: A Breakdown

Riparian areas, also known as floodplains, shorelines, or green zones, are the transitional lands adjacent to bodies of water where the vegetation and soils are strongly influenced by the presence of water. They are formed as the result of water, soil, and vegetation interacting with one another, and are among the most productive and valuable of all landscape types. Riparian areas make up a small fraction of the Alberta landscape, but they are disproportionately vital to fish and wildlife, recreation, agriculture, and society. They perform a multitude of ecosystem functions, including water quality improvement, sediment removal, nutrient cycling, bank stabilization, and habitat management. In recent years, watershed management efforts have been focused on identifying priority areas for riparian restoration and habitat management.

 

Importance of Riparian Areas

Schematic showing the different shoreline components included in a “Riparian Management Area” (image taken from Teichreb and Walker 2008)

Lakes across the province are increasingly becoming the focus of human activities that result in shoreline and riparian area modifications. These modifications, combined with increasing human activity and land use changes in the lake watershed, are leading to a degradation of water quality, which in turn is impacting the quality of life for residents and is threatening aquatic habitats and the species that rely on those habitats.
— Riparian Assessment for North Saskatchewan Region Lakes - Final Report June 2018

Riparian Health

There is no standardized province-wide mapping method for defining and delineating the extent of riparian areas for hydrologic features. Due to this, it is challenging to manage these ecosystems because little is known about the location and size of riparian areas in the province. The most detailed evaluation of riparian conditions comes from site-specific field assessments and/or inventories of riparian areas. Practitioners are trained to evaluate a range of attributes, including vegetation type, structure, and composition, bank characteristics, soil attributes, and land use and disturbance. A final score gives a snapshot of whether a riparian area is “Healthy,” “Healthy, but with problems,” or “Unhealthy.” However, the information that assessments can offer for planning and management at the municipal, regional, or higher levels is limited.

A cost-effective way to assess riparian health across larger areas is through continuous aerial videography. This allowed the entire riparian area to be assessed at one time and provides a permanent geo-referenced record of the status of the shoreline. It is not intended to replace field-based assessments, but instead to complement them.

 

Intactness scores for he shoreline of Pigeon Lake and the left banks (June 2018)

Intactness scores for he shoreline the right banks (June 2018)

High intactness: 86.6km

Moderate intactness: 27.9km

Low intactness: 10.1km

Very low intactness: 30.7km

High intactness: 16.9km

Moderate intactness: 7.7km

Low intactness: 5.3km

Very low intactness: 17.5km

 
 
Previous
Previous

Phosphorus and the Lake

Next
Next

Understanding Water Levels